The Asics Gel-Nimbus series represents a long-standing commitment to providing premium, neutral, and maximally cushioned running footwear. With a history spanning over two decades, the Gel-Nimbus has become a recognizable name in the running community, consistently evolving to meet the needs of runners seeking comfort and protection. As Asics’ flagship performance shoe, the series has maintained a loyal following, with each new iteration anticipated for its advancements in cushioning technology and overall ride experience.
The 27th version of the Gel-Nimbus arrives at a time when maximalist cushioning continues to be a dominant trend in the running shoe market. This latest model aims to elevate the series’ reputation for comfort by incorporating a revamped design intended to deliver an even softer and smoother running experience. However, the Gel-Nimbus 27 enters a competitive landscape populated by other well-established max-cushion offerings, necessitating a thorough examination of its features and performance relative to its peers.
Ready to experience the cloud-like comfort of the Asics Gel-Nimbus 27?
Detailed Technical Specifications
The Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 incorporates a range of carefully selected materials to achieve its design goals. The upper features a soft engineered jacquard mesh, chosen for its ability to comfortably wrap the foot while providing advanced ventilation. Notably, at least 75% of the shoe’s main upper material is constructed with recycled content, reflecting an increasing emphasis on sustainability in athletic footwear. The midsole utilizes FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning, a foam compound made with approximately 24% bio-based content, contributing to a lighter and softer cushioning experience with a more responsive toe-off. To further enhance cushioning, particularly upon landing, PureGEL™ technology is strategically placed in the heel. The outsole features HYBRID ASICSGRIP™ rubber, designed to provide improved traction, enhanced softness, and advanced durability. In some markets, this outsole combines ASICSGRIP™ rubber with AHARPLUS™ materials to offer advanced grip across various terrains. For step-in comfort, the shoe includes an OrthoLite™ X-55 sockliner, produced using a solution dyeing process that reduces water usage and carbon emissions compared to conventional methods. A knit tongue and collar contribute to a soft and supportive feel around the foot , with some reviews highlighting a gusseted design for improved lockdown. Finally, reflective details are incorporated to enhance visibility for runners in low-light conditions.
The Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 weighs in at approximately 10.8 oz (305 g) for the men’s version and 9.3 oz (265 g) for the women’s. Some assessments suggest a slight reduction in weight compared to the previous Gel-Nimbus 26 model. The shoe maintains a heel-to-toe drop of 8 mm, consistent with earlier iterations in the series. The stack height, representing the amount of material between the foot and the ground, is notably high in the Gel-Nimbus 27. For men, it measures 43.5 mm in the heel and 35.5 mm in the forefoot, while the women’s version features 42.5 mm in the heel and 34.5 mm in the forefoot. It is worth noting that some sources provide slightly different measurements. This increased stack height compared to the Gel-Nimbus 26 underscores the shoe’s maximalist design philosophy. The Gel-Nimbus 27 is designed to accommodate runners with neutral pronation and underpronation, focusing on cushioning rather than specific stability features for overpronation.
Table 1: Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 Technical Specifications
Feature | Specification (Men’s) | Specification (Women’s) |
---|---|---|
Upper Material | Engineered Jacquard Mesh | Engineered Jacquard Mesh |
Midsole Material | FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO, PureGEL™ | FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO, PureGEL™ |
Outsole Material | HYBRID ASICSGRIP™ Rubber | HYBRID ASICSGRIP™ Rubber |
Weight | 10.8 oz (305 g) | 9.3 oz (265 g) |
Heel-to-Toe Drop | 8 mm | 8 mm |
Heel Stack Height | 43.5 mm | 42.5 mm |
Forefoot Stack Height | 35.5 mm | 34.5 mm |
Pronation Support | Neutral, Underpronation | Neutral, Underpronation |
Key Technologies | FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO, PureGEL™, HYBRID ASICSGRIP™, OrthoLite™ X-55 | FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO, PureGEL™, HYBRID ASICSGRIP™, OrthoLite™ X-55 |
In-Depth Analysis of Cushioning and Ride
The foundation of the Gel-Nimbus 27’s ride is the FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning. This midsole material is engineered to provide a lighter and softer experience underfoot , while also contributing to a more responsive push-off during the gait cycle. The formulation of this foam has been refined for the 27th iteration, with many reviewers noting that it feels slightly softer and lighter compared to its implementation in the Gel-Nimbus 26. However, perceptions of the foam’s characteristics vary. Some testers describe the cushioning as balanced, neither excessively plush nor overly firm , while others experience it as soft yet retaining a degree of connection to the road, particularly in the forefoot region. Interestingly, a number of assessments indicate that the cushioning feels firmer than might be expected given the shoe’s substantial stack height , with one reviewer even suggesting it feels firmer than the Gel-Nimbus 26. This variability in feedback underscores the subjective nature of cushioning preference and may also reflect differences in individual biomechanics or testing conditions.
Complementing the FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO foam is Asics’ signature PureGEL™ technology. Strategically incorporated into the heel of the Gel-Nimbus 27, this gel aims to provide lightweight cushioning and facilitate softer landings. By focusing its placement in the heel, Asics targets the initial impact zone for many runners, particularly those who exhibit a heel-striking gait pattern. This design choice suggests an intent to mitigate the shock forces experienced during this phase of running, potentially enhancing comfort and reducing the risk of impact-related discomfort over longer distances.
The overall ride of the Gel-Nimbus 27 is frequently characterized as soft and smooth. It is generally considered well-suited for easy runs, long runs, and recovery sessions, where sustained cushioning and a comfortable underfoot feel are paramount. However, some evaluations suggest that the shoe may lack the responsiveness or versatility desired for faster-paced workouts. The substantial stack of foam, while contributing to the high level of cushioning, may also lead to a sensation of the ride feeling somewhat “blocky” for certain runners. This indicates that while the Gel-Nimbus 27 excels at providing a plush and protective experience for everyday mileage, runners seeking a more dynamic or propulsive feel might need to explore alternative options.
Evaluation of Upper Comfort and Fit
The upper of the Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 features a newly designed engineered jacquard mesh. This material is intended to be soft against the foot, highly breathable, and to conform comfortably to the foot’s contours. A key benefit of this mesh is the advanced ventilation it offers, representing an improvement in breathability compared to the engineered knit upper used in the previous Gel-Nimbus 26. This enhanced airflow is particularly beneficial for maintaining comfort during longer runs or in warmer conditions. However, not all assessments are uniformly positive, with at least one reviewer describing the mesh as feeling somewhat stiff and lacking in premium quality.
In terms of fit, the Gel-Nimbus 27 is generally reported to fit true to size. A notable change from earlier versions is the inclusion of a slightly wider toe box, which provides more room for the toes to splay naturally during running. This accommodating forefoot is a welcome feature for many runners who have found previous iterations to be somewhat restrictive in this area. The shoe also offers good midfoot lockdown, particularly due to the presence of a gusseted tongue in many constructions, which helps to secure the foot and prevent slippage. The heel area is designed to provide an excellent lockdown, often attributed to generous padding and a textured lining that helps to keep the heel securely in place. The knit tongue and collar contribute to an overall soft and supportive feel around the ankle and the top of the foot. Despite the generally accommodating fit, some reviewers with particularly narrow feet have reported the fit feeling slightly loose. To cater to a broader range of runners, the Gel-Nimbus 27 is available in standard and wide widths for both men and women , with extra wide options also offered for men and narrow widths available for women in certain regions.
Assessment of Outsole Performance and Durability
The outsole of the Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 features HYBRID ASICSGRIP™ rubber. This compound is engineered to provide a balance of traction, softness, and durability. Many reviews praise the outsole for offering top-tier grip, performing well on both dry and wet road surfaces. In some regional variations, the outsole combines ASICSGRIP™ rubber with AHARPLUS™ materials, further enhancing grip on various terrains and contributing to the overall durability of the shoe. Assessments of the outsole’s durability are generally positive, with several reports indicating good to excellent wear resistance over a number of miles. The traction provided by the outsole is also frequently noted as being reliable, even in wet conditions. However, due to its relatively smooth design, the outsole is not ideally suited for significant off-road running on more technical trails. Overall, the HYBRID ASICSGRIP™ outsole appears to be a dependable component of the Gel-Nimbus 27, providing the necessary traction for road running and exhibiting a good level of durability for everyday training.
Comparative Performance Analysis
The Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 is generally characterized as having a relaxed to balanced ride, prioritizing cushioning over high levels of responsiveness or propulsive energy return. While the FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO midsole foam offers some degree of bounce, it is not as pronounced as the energy return found in more performance-oriented foams, such as Asics’ own FF BLAST Max or those utilized in shoes like the Asics Novablast. This characteristic makes the Gel-Nimbus 27 best suited for easy to moderate paces, where sustained comfort and impact absorption are more critical than maximizing speed. While not designed for fast tempo workouts or setting personal bests, the shoe can serve as a comfortable option for marathon racing, particularly for runners who prioritize cushioning and protection over achieving the fastest possible times.
Marketed as a neutral running shoe, the Gel-Nimbus 27 incorporates several features that contribute to good stability for a shoe in this category. These include a relatively wide base of support, reinforced midsole sidewalls, and a degree of sole flare, all of which help to provide a more grounded and secure feel during the run. Some reviewers even classify the Gel-Nimbus 27 as a “stable neutral” shoe, indicating a level of inherent stability without the prescriptive elements found in shoes designed for overpronation. It is important to reiterate that the Gel-Nimbus 27 is not intended as a dedicated stability shoe for runners with significant overpronation.
Overall, the performance profile of the Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 indicates that it is best suited for runners who prioritize comfort and cushioning for their daily training, easy runs, and long runs. Its ample cushioning also makes it a viable option for heavier runners who require enhanced impact protection. However, runners seeking a lightweight and highly responsive shoe for speed work or racing might find it less ideal. Additionally, the comfort-oriented design extends its appeal to individuals who spend a significant amount of time walking or standing and need a cushioned shoe for all-day wear.
Evolutionary Perspective: Gel-Nimbus 27 vs. Gel-Nimbus 26
The Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 incorporates several design and material changes compared to its predecessor, the Gel-Nimbus 26. One of the most notable updates is an increase in stack height, with approximately 1.5 to 2 mm of additional foam underfoot. The formulation of the FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO midsole foam has also been tweaked, with many reviewers reporting a softer and lighter feel in the Gel-Nimbus 27. However, it is important to note that some testers have found the cushioning in the newer model to be firmer. Another significant change is the upper material, which has been switched from an engineered knit in the Gel-Nimbus 26 to an engineered jacquard mesh in the Gel-Nimbus 27, primarily for improved breathability. The Gel-Nimbus 27 also features a slightly wider toe box, offering more room in the forefoot compared to the previous version. Some reports indicate a minor reduction in the overall weight of the shoe. Finally, the heel bevel has been improved in the Gel-Nimbus 27, contributing to a smoother transition from heel strike to midstance. These updates suggest a focus on enhancing comfort through increased cushioning and a more breathable upper, while also addressing potential fit issues with a more accommodating forefoot.
In terms of performance, the ride of the Gel-Nimbus 27 is generally perceived as being similar to that of the Gel-Nimbus 26, maintaining a plush and well-cushioned experience suitable for everyday training. Some reviewers have noted a slightly firmer or snappier feel in the newer model. A tangible benefit of the update is the improved breathability of the upper, making the Gel-Nimbus 27 more comfortable in warmer conditions. While the Gel-Nimbus 27 incorporates several refinements, the core running experience remains largely consistent with the Gel-Nimbus 26, indicating an iterative approach to the design. This may appeal to runners who are already fans of the series while offering some noticeable enhancements.
The Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 typically carries a slightly higher base price compared to the Gel-Nimbus 26. Some assessments suggest that the updates might be considered minimal by some users and may not fully justify the price increase, leading to recommendations to look for discounts on the still-capable Gel-Nimbus 26. However, the added stack height at a similar weight could be seen as a worthwhile upgrade by runners who prioritize maximum cushioning. Ultimately, the value proposition of the Gel-Nimbus 27 depends on individual priorities and budgetary considerations.
Table 2: Comparison of Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 and Gel-Nimbus 26
Feature | Gel-Nimbus 27 | Gel-Nimbus 26 | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Heel Stack Height | 43.5 mm (Men’s), 42.5 mm (Women’s) | 42 mm (Men’s), 41 mm (Women’s) | Increased by 1.5-2 mm |
Forefoot Stack Height | 35.5 mm (Men’s), 34.5 mm (Women’s) | 34 mm (Men’s), 33 mm (Women’s) | Increased by 1.5-2 mm |
Midsole Foam | Tweaked FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO (Softer/Lighter Perceived) | FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO | Formulation Adjustment (Softer/Lighter) |
Upper Material | Engineered Jacquard Mesh | Engineered Knit | Changed to Jacquard Mesh (More Breathable) |
Toe Box Width | Slightly Wider | Standard | Wider |
Weight (Men’s) | 10.8 oz (305 g) | 10.8 oz (305 g) | Similar / Slight Reduction in Some Reports |
Base Price | $165 | $160 | Increased by $5 |
Breathability (Upper) | Improved | Moderate |
Competitive Landscape: Benchmarking Against Key Competitors
The Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 enters a competitive market of max-cushion neutral daily trainers. Here’s how it stacks up against some key competitors:
When compared to the Brooks Glycerin (various models), both shoes offer significant cushioning for daily running. The Gel-Nimbus 27 is often described as having a softer initial underfoot feel , while the Glycerin might offer a slightly more balanced cushioning. The Glycerin typically has a higher heel-to-toe drop (10 mm vs. the Nimbus 27’s 8 mm). The upper of the Nimbus 27 often features a thinner, gusseted tongue, whereas the Glycerin’s tongue is usually more padded and non-gusseted. Some reviews suggest the Brooks Glycerin might have an edge in outsole durability.
The Saucony Triumph (various models) is another premium cushioned neutral option. The Triumph is frequently noted for being more responsive and versatile than the Gel-Nimbus 27, making it suitable for a wider range of paces . While the Nimbus 27 might feel softer initially, the Triumph often provides a springier ride that maintains its character over longer distances . Both offer substantial cushioning, although the specific feel and responsiveness differ, with the Triumph often utilizing PWRRUN+ or PWRRUN PB foam known for its balance of softness and responsiveness .
The Hoka Bondi (various models) is a well-known maximalist cushioned shoe. The Gel-Nimbus 27 might feel less firm and have a more natural weight distribution compared to the Bondi. The Bondi typically has a lower heel-to-toe drop (around 4-5 mm) than the Nimbus 27 . The Bondi is also often favored for walking and all-day wear due to its maximal cushioning .
The New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 (various versions) is another comparable max-cushion daily trainer . The 1080 is often praised for its sleek design and versatile cushioning that can handle various paces . While the Gel-Nimbus 27 offers a high stack height, the New Balance 1080 can sometimes feel lighter and more agile .
The Nike Pegasus (various models) is a popular and versatile daily trainer often available at a more accessible price point . The Pegasus generally offers a firmer and more responsive ride compared to the plush cushioning of the Gel-Nimbus 27 . The Pegasus is considered more versatile for different types of runs, including tempo work , while the Gel-Nimbus 27 prioritizes cushioning and a softer landing .
The Asics Superblast is another shoe from Asics that is often compared to the Gel-Nimbus 27 . The Superblast is noted for being lighter and more responsive, making it a more versatile option for runners who want a shoe that can handle both easy and faster paces . While the Nimbus 27 offers maximum cushioning, the Superblast provides a bouncier and more energetic feel .
The Mizuno Neo Zen is highlighted as a lightweight trainer with a nitrogen-infused supercritical TPU midsole, offering a comfortable and smooth ride, potentially making it a good alternative to the Gel-Nimbus 27 for those seeking a different underfoot feel.
The Puma Deviate Nitro 3 is mentioned as another alternative that might offer better value or a more exciting running experience compared to the Gel-Nimbus 27.
The Topo Athletic Specter 2 is also suggested as a potential alternative.
The Asics Gel-Cumulus is mentioned as a shoe with a lower stack height but still offering a softer feel, making it an alternative for those who prefer less cushioning than the Gel-Nimbus 27 .
The Hoka Skyflow is presented as a cushioned option that isn’t overly soft, offering more bounce and energy return, potentially being more versatile than the Nimbus.
The Asics Gel-Kayano is suggested as a stability counterpart to the neutral Gel-Nimbus for runners who need more support for overpronation.
Table 3: Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 vs. Key Competitors
Shoe Model | Category | Heel Stack Height (mm) | Forefoot Stack Height (mm) | Heel-to-Toe Drop (mm) | Midsole Material | Ride Feel | Weight (Men’s oz) | Approximate Price ($) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 | Max Cushion Neutral | 43.5 | 35.5 | 8 | FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO, PureGEL™ | Plush, Smooth | 10.8 | 165 |
Brooks Glycerin 22 | Max Cushion Neutral | 38 | 28 | 10 | DNA LOFT v3 | Soft, Balanced | 10.1 | 160 |
Saucony Triumph 22 | Max Cushion Neutral | 37 | 27 | 10 | PWRRUN+ or PWRRUN PB | Plush, Responsive | 10.1 | 160 |
Hoka Bondi 9 | Max Cushion Neutral | 31 | 27 | 4 | EVA | Soft, Rockered | 11.2 | 165 |
New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080 v14 | Max Cushion Neutral | 38 | 32 | 6 | Fresh Foam X | Soft, Versatile | 10.4 | 165 |
Nike Pegasus 41 | Daily Trainer | 34 | 24 | 10 | ReactX, Zoom Air | Responsive, Firm | 10.4 | 140 |
Asics Superblast 2 | Versatile Trainer | 45.5 | 31.5 | 8 | FF BLAST TURBO, FF BLAST PLUS | Light, Responsive | 9.9 | 140 |
Note: Specifications may vary slightly based on source and shoe size.
Synthesis of User Feedback and Ratings
User feedback on the Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 frequently highlights its exceptional comfort and ample cushioning, particularly for easy-paced and long-distance runs. Many appreciate the plush feel upon stepping into the shoe and the overall comfort provided by the upper. The updated jacquard mesh upper is generally well-received for its improved breathability compared to previous versions. The slightly wider toe box is also a positive change for many runners, offering a more accommodating fit in the forefoot.
However, opinions on the midsole’s softness are somewhat divided. While many users find the level of cushioning ideal for easy runs, some feel that it is excessively soft or “smushy,” leading to a lack of desired responsiveness. There is even contradictory feedback within some individual reviews regarding the perceived firmness. A recurring concern among some users is the weight and bulk of the shoe, which they feel makes it less suitable for faster-paced running. When comparing the Gel-Nimbus 27 to its predecessor, the Gel-Nimbus 26, user opinions vary on whether the updates represent a significant improvement, with some recommending that potential buyers consider purchasing the older model if it is available at a discounted price.
Beyond running, many users find the Gel-Nimbus 27 to be a comfortable option for walking and for extended periods of standing, highlighting its versatility for everyday wear. One reviewer did note a potential hotspot in the upper near the lace holes. Overall, user feedback confirms the Gel-Nimbus 27’s primary strength in delivering comfort and cushioning for easier running and daily activities. However, the shoe’s heavier weight and the ongoing discussion about the softness of the midsole indicate that it might not be the preferred choice for all runners, especially those prioritizing a more agile or performance-oriented experience.
Evidence-Based Recommendations
Based on the available evidence, the Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 is ideally suited for runners with neutral pronation or mild underpronation who are seeking a high-cushion daily trainer for road running. It is an excellent choice for individuals who prioritize maximum comfort and impact absorption during easy runs, long runs, and recovery sessions. The ample cushioning also makes it a good option for heavier runners who require enhanced protection. Furthermore, its comfortable design extends its utility to walkers and those who spend many hours on their feet and need a cushioned shoe for all-day wear.
For training purposes, the Gel-Nimbus 27 is well-suited for daily mileage at easy to moderate paces and excels during long runs where cushioning and comfort are paramount. It also serves effectively as a recovery shoe following hard workouts or races. Runners who prioritize comfort over outright speed may even consider it for marathon racing.
However, runners seeking a highly responsive shoe for tempo runs or speed work should explore other options that offer a more energetic ride, such as the Asics Novablast or Saucony Triumph. Individuals who prefer a lighter shoe with greater ground feel might find the Gel-Nimbus 27 to be too bulky. Budget-conscious buyers should compare the price of the Gel-Nimbus 27 with the potentially discounted Gel-Nimbus 26, as the performance differences might not justify the price premium for all users. Finally, runners with particularly narrow feet might find the fit slightly less secure than desired, despite the shoe generally fitting true to size.
Conclusion
In summary, the Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 stands as a premium max-cushion neutral running shoe that continues to prioritize the hallmarks of the series: exceptional comfort and substantial cushioning. The key updates in this iteration include a slightly increased stack height, a refined FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO midsole foam, and a more breathable engineered jacquard mesh upper. These changes contribute to a comfortable and smooth ride that is particularly well-suited for easy runs, long runs, and recovery. The shoe also offers an accommodating fit, including a wider toe box, and is available in multiple widths to suit a variety of foot shapes.
The primary strengths of the Gel-Nimbus 27 lie in its exceptional cushioning and overall comfort, the improved breathability of the upper, its accommodating fit, and its good durability. However, its weaknesses include a tendency to feel somewhat heavy and bulky, a level of responsiveness that is not optimal for faster-paced running, and a price point that might be a consideration for some, especially when compared to the previous model.
Considering its position in the current running shoe market, the Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 remains a strong contender for runners who prioritize a plush and protective ride for their daily training. The incremental updates in this version build upon the established reputation of the series, providing a reliable option for those who value comfort above all else. Nevertheless, the highly competitive max-cushion market offers numerous alternatives, and runners seeking a more versatile or budget-friendly shoe may find other models that better align with their specific needs and preferences.